The Unconstitutionality by Omission and the Control Mechanisms in Peru from the Comparative Approach

The present work aims to offer an overview of what the treatment of legislative omissions by the Peruvian constitutional justice has meant, in which, although an institute such as unconstitutionality by omission is not regulated, the Constitutional Court, through its jurisprudence, has been in charg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Author: Cárdenas Gonzáles, José Rolando
Format: article
Status:Published version
Publication Date:2023
Country:México
Institution:UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO
Repository:Cuestiones Constitucionales. Revista Mexicana de Derecho Constitucional
Language:Spanish
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18803
Online Access:https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/cuestiones-constitucionales/article/view/18803
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:constitutional justice
legislative omission
unconstitutionality by omission
Constitutional Court
unconstitutional state of affairs
justicia constitucional
omisión legislativa
inconstitucionalidad por omisión
Tribunal Constitucional
estado de cosas inconstitucional
Description
Summary:The present work aims to offer an overview of what the treatment of legislative omissions by the Peruvian constitutional justice has meant, in which, although an institute such as unconstitutionality by omission is not regulated, the Constitutional Court, through its jurisprudence, has been in charge of introducing this figure into our legal system. However, despite not being a mechanism usually used by the constitutional judge, its relevance regains prominence, when resorting to legal tools that are equally suitable, but foreign, such as the unconstitutional state of affairs; which leads us to ask ourselves if a constitutional or legal regulation is pertinent; question that will lead us to the analysis of comparative treatment.