The Unconstitutionality by Omission and the Control Mechanisms in Peru from the Comparative Approach
The present work aims to offer an overview of what the treatment of legislative omissions by the Peruvian constitutional justice has meant, in which, although an institute such as unconstitutionality by omission is not regulated, the Constitutional Court, through its jurisprudence, has been in charg...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO |
| Repositorio: | Cuestiones Constitucionales. Revista Mexicana de Derecho Constitucional |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18803 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/cuestiones-constitucionales/article/view/18803 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | constitutional justice legislative omission unconstitutionality by omission Constitutional Court unconstitutional state of affairs justicia constitucional omisión legislativa inconstitucionalidad por omisión Tribunal Constitucional estado de cosas inconstitucional |
| Sumario: | The present work aims to offer an overview of what the treatment of legislative omissions by the Peruvian constitutional justice has meant, in which, although an institute such as unconstitutionality by omission is not regulated, the Constitutional Court, through its jurisprudence, has been in charge of introducing this figure into our legal system. However, despite not being a mechanism usually used by the constitutional judge, its relevance regains prominence, when resorting to legal tools that are equally suitable, but foreign, such as the unconstitutional state of affairs; which leads us to ask ourselves if a constitutional or legal regulation is pertinent; question that will lead us to the analysis of comparative treatment. |
|---|