Historiografía y jóvenes: la conversión de la juventud en objeto de estudio historiográfico
[EN] The aim of this article is to analyse the several milestones in the evolution of the history of youth. Its relation to historic international events and to the development of the historiography, understood as “the science that studies history”, are considered. The article addresses the influenc...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Data de publicação: | 2018 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| Repositório: | DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:digital.csic.es:10261/180656 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/180656 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | Juventud Historiografía Método comparativo Historia social Historia de la juventud Youth Historiography Comparative methods Social history Youth history http://metadata.un.org/sdg/4 Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all |
| Resumo: | [EN] The aim of this article is to analyse the several milestones in the evolution of the history of youth. Its relation to historic international events and to the development of the historiography, understood as “the science that studies history”, are considered. The article addresses the influence of the various historiographical schools developed during the 20th century. It shows that the increase in the investigations on the history of youth has not only been linked to young people’s own history, but also, and very significantly, to the changes in the historiography itself. Finally, it outlines the current boom in the history of youth, the importance of the comparison as an appropriate methodology for the study of the subjects related with that history, and the role these researches can have in a historiography that defends the return to the "old" Eric Hobsbawm's idea of defining social history as the history of society. |
|---|