Acute Effect of Myofascial Self-Release in Antagonist Muscles on Total Training Volume and Fatigue Index of Agonist Muscles: An Experimental Study

Introduction: Self-myofascial release (SMFR) has been used to alleviate the symptoms of delayed onset muscle pain, increase range of joint movement and promote improvements in muscle strength performance. Objective: To verify the effect of SMFR of antagonist muscles on total training volume (VTT) an...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Xafic Cruz Negris, Petterson, Christian de Alcântara Souza, Davidson, de Freitas, Fábio Henrique, Gonçalves, Michel Moraes, Lameira Miranda, Humberto
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:Brasil
Recursos:Centro de Capacitação Física do Exército (CCFEX)
Repositorio:Revista de Educação Física
Idioma:portugués
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.revistadeeducacaofisica.emnuvens.com.br:article/2903
Acesso em linha:https://revistadeeducacaofisica.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/2903
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:rolo de massagem
recuperação
intra-séries
repetições
supino reto
foam roller
recovery
intrasets
repetitions
bench press
Descrição
Resumo:Introduction: Self-myofascial release (SMFR) has been used to alleviate the symptoms of delayed onset muscle pain, increase range of joint movement and promote improvements in muscle strength performance. Objective: To verify the effect of SMFR of antagonist muscles on total training volume (VTT) and fatigue index (FI) in trained men. Methods: Eight recreationally trained men participated in the study. Crossover study, with random entry into the two experimental protocols: traditional protocol (GPT), with the execution of the training session with an interval between sets without ALMF; ALMF protocol (GALMF), with the execution of the training session with an interval between sets with antagonist ALMF. Statistical analysis was performed using the dependent T test. Results: No significant differences were observed between the experimental protocols in VTT (p=0.975) and IF (p=0.495). Conclusion: The use of ALMF of antagonists, between sets of a strength training session, does not seem to interfere with the VTT and IF of agonists