Legal Neo rhetoric.
Abstract:The present paper provides a categorization and hierarchy of the various stylistic stages in which rhetoric has been presented in time, to effect of contrasting with the concept proposed in the article in a new way to understand and build the discourse in a judicial dispute, based on the co...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
| País: | Uruguay |
| Institución: | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| Repositorio: | LIBERI |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/7081 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/740 https://hdl.handle.net/10895/7081 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | retórica argumentación ley juicio rhetoric argumentation law trial |
| Sumario: | Abstract:The present paper provides a categorization and hierarchy of the various stylistic stages in which rhetoric has been presented in time, to effect of contrasting with the concept proposed in the article in a new way to understand and build the discourse in a judicial dispute, based on the concept of “rationality” understood as argumentative discourse. To this new way of conceiving the legal rationality, the author calls it “Neo rhetoric”. |
|---|