Rhetoric construction of legal argument.
Abstract. The legal argument is a rhetorical procedure in which the interpreter constructs the meaning of the law by performing language actions on the self-referential language of the legal statement and on the language of the various narrative versions of the fact at trial. The rhetorical construc...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
| País: | Uruguay |
| Institución: | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| Repositorio: | LIBERI |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/7119 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/803 https://hdl.handle.net/10895/7119 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | argumentación jurídica retórica argumentación derecho legal argument rhetoric argument law |
| Sumario: | Abstract. The legal argument is a rhetorical procedure in which the interpreter constructs the meaning of the law by performing language actions on the self-referential language of the legal statement and on the language of the various narrative versions of the fact at trial. The rhetorical construction of the meaning in the argumentative discourse of the parties is submitted at trial as the exact meaning of the rule, and the strict implementation of the legal statement. This article proposes rhetorical resources that enable the construction of the meaning of the argumentative discourse in the lawsuit. |
|---|