TROLLEYOLOGY: WHOSE TROLLEY DILEMMA IS IT?
The author recovers the original sources of the so-called Trolley Dilemma because he considers that there is confusion about who the original author is. He argues that it is not Phillipa Foot as it is commonly cited, not even Judith Thomson, but that its roots are more distant and are found in two G...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2019 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Universidad de San Martín de Porres |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Universidad de San Martín de Porres |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.usmp.edu.pe:article/1723 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/1723 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Dilema del Tranvía teoría del doble efecto daño colateral teoría causalista teoría de la acción finalista. |
| Sumario: | The author recovers the original sources of the so-called Trolley Dilemma because he considers that there is confusion about who the original author is. He argues that it is not Phillipa Foot as it is commonly cited, not even Judith Thomson, but that its roots are more distant and are found in two German jurists: Hans Welzel and, even earlier, Karl Engisch. Proposes that the solution to the dilemma is given from the positive law and not in consequentialist speculations. |
|---|