Being a sociologist: the usual habit of permanent interrogation
In the present article, a reflection is made on the work of the sociologist at present. For this, three fundamental questions were taken as the axes of analysis: the why, the how and the for what of sociology, since we consider that the permanent interrogation on these questions is what allows the c...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2019 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO |
| Repositorio: | Acta Sociológica |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/70701 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/ras/article/view/70701 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Sociology (s) being a sociologist social sciences time future. Sociología(s) ser sociólogo/a ciencias sociales tiempo futuro. Sociologias (s) ser sociólogo ciências sociais tempo |
| Sumario: | In the present article, a reflection is made on the work of the sociologist at present. For this, three fundamental questions were taken as the axes of analysis: the why, the how and the for what of sociology, since we consider that the permanent interrogation on these questions is what allows the construction of the sociologist. Raising the question of permanent interrogation as a condition for the possibility of discipline allows contributing to the current debate to elucidate, from a broad but demanding perspective, the problems of its future in the interpretative framework of the social and temporal. |
|---|