El estado actual del cibercrimen en Perú y el derecho alemán
Just over two decades since the Internet massified in much of the world, not only as a usefulness to send or receive an email or to search for some curious data but also for the use of applications that substantially facilitate people's lives: paying online accounts, smart supports for multiple...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO |
| Repositorio: | Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18367 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/derecho-comparado/article/view/18367 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | ciberdelincuencia ius puniendi política criminal medios digitales sociedad de riesgo cybercrime criminal policy digital media risk society |
| Sumario: | Just over two decades since the Internet massified in much of the world, not only as a usefulness to send or receive an email or to search for some curious data but also for the use of applications that substantially facilitate people's lives: paying online accounts, smart supports for multiple devices and teleworking; dynamism in this new form of social interaction could not be given without the Internet. However, this technological development also involves a number of risks that have increased in recent years: personal data thefts through phishing, vulnerability of government pages through doxing, child pornography, and computer fraud are an example of the computer risks that become more common every day in a post-industrial society. The aim of this work is to demonstrate the risks to which legal goods are exposed in cyberspace, when the Internet provider does not submit any preventive mechanism (artificial intelligence system) to combat it. Undoubtedly, this is due to the fact that there is a deficient regulatory framework that obliges service providers to monitor their platforms as a source of danger. |
|---|