The new lispendens regime in the Regulation Brussels I bis and the challenge met by Chinese jurisdiction

The new regime of lis pendens in Regulation Brussels I bis has extended its application to the third states including China. This may be a challenge to Chinese jurisdiction since it has not established a uniform criterion to deal with lis pendens. However, the provisions regarding the relation with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Zhang, Huang
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2014
País:España
Institución:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repositorio:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ddd.uab.cat:212608
Acceso en línea:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/212608
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.17103/reei.28.13
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Regulation Brussels I bis
Lis pendens
Reflexive effect
Exclusive jurisdiction
Choice of forum agreement
The EU-China Convention
Reglamento Bruselas I bis
Litispendencia
Efecto reflejo
Competencia judicial internacional exclusiva
Pacto de elección de foro
Convenio entre la UE y China
id ES_ef2a9ef69d1bd47ef52fa2e207b8a7cb
oai_identifier_str oai:ddd.uab.cat:212608
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling The new lispendens regime in the Regulation Brussels I bis and the challenge met by Chinese jurisdictionEl nuevo régimen de la litispendencia en el Reglamento Bruselas I bis y el reto afrontado por la jurisdicción chinaZhang, HuangRegulation Brussels I bisLis pendensReflexive effectExclusive jurisdictionChoice of forum agreementThe EU-China ConventionReglamento Bruselas I bisLitispendenciaEfecto reflejoCompetencia judicial internacional exclusivaPacto de elección de foroConvenio entre la UE y ChinaThe new regime of lis pendens in Regulation Brussels I bis has extended its application to the third states including China. This may be a challenge to Chinese jurisdiction since it has not established a uniform criterion to deal with lis pendens. However, the provisions regarding the relation with third states in the new regime of lis pendens still need further examination. Besides, the unilateral statement in the Regulation may be unfair from the Chinese perspective. In this way, it may be relevant for the Chinese and the EU legislators to seek a solution through the establishment of a bilateral Convention that is specialized at dealing with the regime of lis pendens.El nuevo régimen de la litispendencia en el Reglamento Bruselas I bis extiende su aplicación a los terceros países, entre los que se incluye China. Esta extensión constituye un reto para la jurisdicción china a causa de la ausencia de un criterio uniforme en cuanto a la litispendencia en el Derecho chino. La aplicación de las normas en el Reglamento Bruselas I bis merece una atenta consideración ya que el tratamiento unilateral que realiza este Reglamento puede considerarse injusto desde la perspectiva china. Es por esto que se propone como solución el establecimiento de un convenio bilateral entre la UE y China en materia de la litispendencia. 22014-01-0120142014-01-01Articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501VoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://ddd.uab.cat/record/212608https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.17103/reei.28.13reponame:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UABinstname:Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaInglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència d'ús Creative Commons. Es permet la reproducció total o parcial, la distribució i la comunicació pública de l'obra, sempre que es reconegui l'autoria de l'obra original. No es permet la creació d'obres derivades.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ddd.uab.cat:2126082026-06-06T12:50:31Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The new lispendens regime in the Regulation Brussels I bis and the challenge met by Chinese jurisdiction
El nuevo régimen de la litispendencia en el Reglamento Bruselas I bis y el reto afrontado por la jurisdicción china
title The new lispendens regime in the Regulation Brussels I bis and the challenge met by Chinese jurisdiction
spellingShingle The new lispendens regime in the Regulation Brussels I bis and the challenge met by Chinese jurisdiction
Zhang, Huang
Regulation Brussels I bis
Lis pendens
Reflexive effect
Exclusive jurisdiction
Choice of forum agreement
The EU-China Convention
Reglamento Bruselas I bis
Litispendencia
Efecto reflejo
Competencia judicial internacional exclusiva
Pacto de elección de foro
Convenio entre la UE y China
title_short The new lispendens regime in the Regulation Brussels I bis and the challenge met by Chinese jurisdiction
title_full The new lispendens regime in the Regulation Brussels I bis and the challenge met by Chinese jurisdiction
title_fullStr The new lispendens regime in the Regulation Brussels I bis and the challenge met by Chinese jurisdiction
title_full_unstemmed The new lispendens regime in the Regulation Brussels I bis and the challenge met by Chinese jurisdiction
title_sort The new lispendens regime in the Regulation Brussels I bis and the challenge met by Chinese jurisdiction
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Zhang, Huang
author Zhang, Huang
author_facet Zhang, Huang
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Regulation Brussels I bis
Lis pendens
Reflexive effect
Exclusive jurisdiction
Choice of forum agreement
The EU-China Convention
Reglamento Bruselas I bis
Litispendencia
Efecto reflejo
Competencia judicial internacional exclusiva
Pacto de elección de foro
Convenio entre la UE y China
topic Regulation Brussels I bis
Lis pendens
Reflexive effect
Exclusive jurisdiction
Choice of forum agreement
The EU-China Convention
Reglamento Bruselas I bis
Litispendencia
Efecto reflejo
Competencia judicial internacional exclusiva
Pacto de elección de foro
Convenio entre la UE y China
description The new regime of lis pendens in Regulation Brussels I bis has extended its application to the third states including China. This may be a challenge to Chinese jurisdiction since it has not established a uniform criterion to deal with lis pendens. However, the provisions regarding the relation with third states in the new regime of lis pendens still need further examination. Besides, the unilateral statement in the Regulation may be unfair from the Chinese perspective. In this way, it may be relevant for the Chinese and the EU legislators to seek a solution through the establishment of a bilateral Convention that is specialized at dealing with the regime of lis pendens.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2
2014-01-01
2014
2014-01-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv Article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
VoR
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://ddd.uab.cat/record/212608
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.17103/reei.28.13
url https://ddd.uab.cat/record/212608
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.17103/reei.28.13
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
instname:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
instname_str Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
reponame_str Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
collection Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869423838039638016
score 15.300724

Similares en LA Referencia