The new lispendens regime in the Regulation Brussels I bis and the challenge met by Chinese jurisdiction
The new regime of lis pendens in Regulation Brussels I bis has extended its application to the third states including China. This may be a challenge to Chinese jurisdiction since it has not established a uniform criterion to deal with lis pendens. However, the provisions regarding the relation with...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2014 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona |
| Repositorio: | Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ddd.uab.cat:212608 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://ddd.uab.cat/record/212608 https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.17103/reei.28.13 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Regulation Brussels I bis Lis pendens Reflexive effect Exclusive jurisdiction Choice of forum agreement The EU-China Convention Reglamento Bruselas I bis Litispendencia Efecto reflejo Competencia judicial internacional exclusiva Pacto de elección de foro Convenio entre la UE y China |
| Sumario: | The new regime of lis pendens in Regulation Brussels I bis has extended its application to the third states including China. This may be a challenge to Chinese jurisdiction since it has not established a uniform criterion to deal with lis pendens. However, the provisions regarding the relation with third states in the new regime of lis pendens still need further examination. Besides, the unilateral statement in the Regulation may be unfair from the Chinese perspective. In this way, it may be relevant for the Chinese and the EU legislators to seek a solution through the establishment of a bilateral Convention that is specialized at dealing with the regime of lis pendens. |
|---|