Universalità e particolarismo dei diritti fondamentali

Despite the vast scientific production on the subject, the notion of fundamental rights is still controversial and problematic. The a. reviews some of the main positions of the current Italian legal-philosophical debate on fundamental rights. In the first part, two very different universalistic posi...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor: Zaccaria, G. (Giuseppe)|||/items/3922e86a-3860-4020-ac6b-09f7c253133a
Formato: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2019
País:España
Recursos:Universidad de Navarra
Repositorio:Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171/60466
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/10171/60466
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:diritti fondamentali
universalità
particolarismo
diritto e morale
id ES_ed0d4acac327dfcb9600fec7da3a76c4
oai_identifier_str oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171/60466
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Universalità e particolarismo dei diritti fondamentaliUniversalism and Particularism in Fundamental RightsZaccaria, G. (Giuseppe)|||/items/3922e86a-3860-4020-ac6b-09f7c253133adiritti fondamentaliuniversalitàparticolarismodiritto e moraleDespite the vast scientific production on the subject, the notion of fundamental rights is still controversial and problematic. The a. reviews some of the main positions of the current Italian legal-philosophical debate on fundamental rights. In the first part, two very different universalistic positions are examined: the formal theory of law of Luigi Ferrajoli, of which the author shows the contradictions with respect to the premises of a value-free approach; and the ≪substantive≫ theory of law of Francesco Viola, who, claiming the double nature of fundamental rights – as legal rights and as moral rights – presupposes that rights are positivized and therefore concretized in the processes of interpretation and application of law. In the second part, the a. analyses critically two different particularistic approaches to rights: Luca Baccelli, recognizing the historical and cultural connotation of rights, finds their genesis in particular historical circumstances; while Gianluigi Palombella binds fundamental rights to their contingent institutional function. In the conclusion, the a. supports the thesis of the universality of rights as an encounter between universal and particular, developed through a multicultural dialogue that enhances differences in a broader logic.Vengono dapprima esaminate due posizioni universalistiche tra loro molto diverse: la teoria formale di Luigi Ferrajoli, di cui e mostrata la contraddittorieta rispetto alle premesse di un approccio avalutativo; e la teoria ≪sostanzialistica≫ di Francesco Viola, che rivendicando la doppia natura dei diritti fondamentali, come <i>legal rights</i> e come <i>moral rights</i>, presuppone che i diritti vengano positivizzati e percio concretizzati nei processi interpretativi e applicativi. Successivamente sono analizzate criticamente due diverse tesi particolaristiche: quella di Luca Baccelli che, riconoscendo ai diritti una connotazione storica e culturale, ne afferma la genesi in particolari circostanze storiche; e quella di Gianluigi Palombella che lega i diritti fondamentali alla loro contingente funzione istituzionale. La conclusione del saggio sostiene la tesi dell’universalita dei diritti come incontro tra universale e particolare, sviluppato tramite un dialogo multiculturale che valorizzi le differenze in una logica piu ampia.Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de NavarraDadun. Depósito Académico Digital Universidad de Navarra20212021-05-1720192019-01-0120192019-01-01journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10171/60466reponame:Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarrainstname:Universidad de NavarraEspañolspaopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:dadun.unav.edu:10171/604662026-06-21T12:47:57Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Universalità e particolarismo dei diritti fondamentali
Universalism and Particularism in Fundamental Rights
title Universalità e particolarismo dei diritti fondamentali
spellingShingle Universalità e particolarismo dei diritti fondamentali
Zaccaria, G. (Giuseppe)|||/items/3922e86a-3860-4020-ac6b-09f7c253133a
diritti fondamentali
universalità
particolarismo
diritto e morale
title_short Universalità e particolarismo dei diritti fondamentali
title_full Universalità e particolarismo dei diritti fondamentali
title_fullStr Universalità e particolarismo dei diritti fondamentali
title_full_unstemmed Universalità e particolarismo dei diritti fondamentali
title_sort Universalità e particolarismo dei diritti fondamentali
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Zaccaria, G. (Giuseppe)|||/items/3922e86a-3860-4020-ac6b-09f7c253133a
author Zaccaria, G. (Giuseppe)|||/items/3922e86a-3860-4020-ac6b-09f7c253133a
author_facet Zaccaria, G. (Giuseppe)|||/items/3922e86a-3860-4020-ac6b-09f7c253133a
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital Universidad de Navarra
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv diritti fondamentali
universalità
particolarismo
diritto e morale
topic diritti fondamentali
universalità
particolarismo
diritto e morale
description Despite the vast scientific production on the subject, the notion of fundamental rights is still controversial and problematic. The a. reviews some of the main positions of the current Italian legal-philosophical debate on fundamental rights. In the first part, two very different universalistic positions are examined: the formal theory of law of Luigi Ferrajoli, of which the author shows the contradictions with respect to the premises of a value-free approach; and the ≪substantive≫ theory of law of Francesco Viola, who, claiming the double nature of fundamental rights – as legal rights and as moral rights – presupposes that rights are positivized and therefore concretized in the processes of interpretation and application of law. In the second part, the a. analyses critically two different particularistic approaches to rights: Luca Baccelli, recognizing the historical and cultural connotation of rights, finds their genesis in particular historical circumstances; while Gianluigi Palombella binds fundamental rights to their contingent institutional function. In the conclusion, the a. supports the thesis of the universality of rights as an encounter between universal and particular, developed through a multicultural dialogue that enhances differences in a broader logic.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019
2019-01-01
2019
2019-01-01
2021
2021-05-17
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv journal article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10171/60466
url https://hdl.handle.net/10171/60466
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Español
spa
language_invalid_str_mv Español
language spa
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra
instname:Universidad de Navarra
instname_str Universidad de Navarra
reponame_str Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra
collection Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869423394755182593
score 15.301603

Registos relacionados