Universalità e particolarismo dei diritti fondamentali
Despite the vast scientific production on the subject, the notion of fundamental rights is still controversial and problematic. The a. reviews some of the main positions of the current Italian legal-philosophical debate on fundamental rights. In the first part, two very different universalistic posi...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2019 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Navarra |
| Repositorio: | Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171/60466 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/60466 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | diritti fondamentali universalità particolarismo diritto e morale |
| Sumario: | Despite the vast scientific production on the subject, the notion of fundamental rights is still controversial and problematic. The a. reviews some of the main positions of the current Italian legal-philosophical debate on fundamental rights. In the first part, two very different universalistic positions are examined: the formal theory of law of Luigi Ferrajoli, of which the author shows the contradictions with respect to the premises of a value-free approach; and the ≪substantive≫ theory of law of Francesco Viola, who, claiming the double nature of fundamental rights – as legal rights and as moral rights – presupposes that rights are positivized and therefore concretized in the processes of interpretation and application of law. In the second part, the a. analyses critically two different particularistic approaches to rights: Luca Baccelli, recognizing the historical and cultural connotation of rights, finds their genesis in particular historical circumstances; while Gianluigi Palombella binds fundamental rights to their contingent institutional function. In the conclusion, the a. supports the thesis of the universality of rights as an encounter between universal and particular, developed through a multicultural dialogue that enhances differences in a broader logic. |
|---|