La transició de joves amb discapacitat intel·lectual a la vida adulta: una mirada actual des de l'òptica de la Convenció sobre els Drets de les Persones amb Discapacitat
Despite the theoretical advances developed from international research in recent decades, the transition process to adulthood for young people with intellectual disabilities is still one of the most complex periods in their lives. The enactment of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabil...
| Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Status: | Published version |
| Publication Date: | 2021 |
| Country: | España |
| Institution: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repository: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:recercat.cat:10256/24813 |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10256/24813 |
| Access Level: | Open access |
| Keyword: | Persones amb discapacitat mental -- Treball People with mental disabilities -- Employment Persones amb discapacitat -- Situació legal, lleis, etc. People with disabilities -- Legal status, laws, etc. Persones amb discapacitat -- Integració social People with disabilities -- Social integration |
| Summary: | Despite the theoretical advances developed from international research in recent decades, the transition process to adulthood for young people with intellectual disabilities is still one of the most complex periods in their lives. The enactment of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (United Nations, 2006), which emphasises the person as a subject of rights, highlights the transition process as a key moment in which it is necessary to strengthen the bases that will allow to advance in a series of rights linked to the social inclusion: lifelong learning, work, independent life, community participation, among others. This article reviews the transition process to adult life from the perspective of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (United Nations, 2006) and analyses the potential of a specific tool (Taxonomy 2.0, by Kohler, Gothberg, Fowler i Coyle, 2016) for the design, application, and evaluation of good transition practices |
|---|