GRADE equity guidelines 4: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: evidence to decision process

Objectives: The aim of this paper is to provide detailed guidance on how to incorporate health equity within the GRADE (Grading Recommendations Assessment and Development Evidence) evidence to decision process. Study Design and Setting: We developed this guidance based on the GRADE evidence to decis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Pottie, K, Welch, V, Morton, R, Akl, EA, Eslava-Schmalbach, JH, Katikireddi, V, Singh, J, Moja, L, Lang, E, Magrini, N, Thabane, L, Stanev, R, Matovinovic, E, Snellman, A, Briel, M, Shea, B, Tugwell, P, Schunemann, H, Guyatt, G, Alonso-Coello, P
Format: article
Status:Published version
Publication Date:2017
Country:España
Institution:Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)
Repository:r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau
OAI Identifier:oai:iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com:p6138
Online Access:https://iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=6138
https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc6538528
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Health equity
Disadvantaged
Underserved
Special populations
Evidence to decision process
GRADE guidelines
Description
Summary:Objectives: The aim of this paper is to provide detailed guidance on how to incorporate health equity within the GRADE (Grading Recommendations Assessment and Development Evidence) evidence to decision process. Study Design and Setting: We developed this guidance based on the GRADE evidence to decision framework, iteratively reviewing and modifying draft documents, in person discussion of project group members and input from other GRADE members. Results: Considering the impact on health equity may be required, both in general guidelines and guidelines that focus on disadvantaged populations. We suggest two approaches to incorporate equity considerations: (1) assessing the potential impact of interventions on equity and (2) incorporating equity considerations when judging or weighing each of the evidence to decision criteria. We provide guidance and include illustrative examples. Conclusion: Guideline panels should consider the impact of recommendations on health equity with attention to remote and underserviced settings and disadvantaged populations. Guideline panels may wish to incorporate equity judgments across the evidence to decision framework. This is the fourth and final paper in a series about considering equity in the GRADE guideline development process. This series is coming from the GRADE equity subgroup. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Similar Items