Fate of the mandible in class III patients subjected to bimaxillary surgery with a new 3D planning reference

Class III patients have classically been managed through monomaxillary techniques, mainly involving mandibular setback movements. More recently, according to the upper incisor to soft tissue plane (UI-STP) or Barcelona Line (BL) planning protocol, bimaxillary procedures for upper maxilla advancement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Hernández-Alfaro, Federico, de la Fuente Vázquez, Carlos, Valls-Ontañón, Adaia, Haas Junior, Orion Luiz, Giralt Hernando, Maria, Masià Gridilla, Jorge
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:20.500.12328/4823
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/4823
https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app15031069
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Maloclusió d'angle III
Deformitat dentofacial
Estètica
Mandíbula
Apnea obstructiva del son
Cirurgia ortognàtica
Maloclusión de clase III de Angle
Deformidad dentofacial
Estética
Apnea obstructiva del sueño
Cirugía ortognática
Angle class III malocclusion
Dentofacial deformity
Esthetics
Mandible
Obstructive sleep apnea
Orthognathic surgery
616.3
Descripción
Sumario:Class III patients have classically been managed through monomaxillary techniques, mainly involving mandibular setback movements. More recently, according to the upper incisor to soft tissue plane (UI-STP) or Barcelona Line (BL) planning protocol, bimaxillary procedures for upper maxilla advancement and reduced mandibular setback have been recommended in order to secure better aesthetic outcomes and avoid upper airway constriction. The present study describes the jaw movements in the sagittal plane performed in class III patients subjected to bimaxillary surgery following the BL protocol. A retrospective evaluation was performed on 124 class III patients subjected to bimaxillary surgery. All subjects underwent upper maxilla advancement. A total of 112 patients received mandible advancement movement (90.3%), nine received mandibular setback (7.25%), and the mandible underwent no movement along the sagittal dimension in the three remaining patients (2.4%). Mandibular advancement was significantly the most frequent treatment option. The presented results suggest that when the BL planning protocol is used as an aesthetic and functional reference, class III occlusion appears mostly related to maxillary sagittal hypoplasia instead of mandible hyperplasia, so bimaxillary advancement surgery should be considered as one of the first-choice procedures for the treatment of these patients.