Legal validity and other properties of legal norms

In Kelsen's very influential account, legal validity is the specific mode of existence of legal norms. For this reason, legal validity entails legal applicability and legal bindingness. The chapter intends to show that these notions should be distinguished. It starts with the notion of memb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Moreso, Josep Joan, Ródenas, Ángeles
Tipo de recurso: capítulo de libro
Estado:Versión aceptada para publicación
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Repositorio:Repositorio Digital de la UPF
OAI Identifier:oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/72552
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10230/72552
https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/9780191964718.003.0008
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Legal validity
Existence of norms
Lgal applicability
Legal bindingness
Legal system membership
Robust normativity
id ES_78d95f337fcaf1f22a12e95a7c8b09c6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/72552
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Legal validity and other properties of legal normsMoreso, Josep JoanRódenas, ÁngelesLegal validityExistence of normsLgal applicabilityLegal bindingnessLegal system membershipRobust normativityIn Kelsen's very influential account, legal validity is the specific mode of existence of legal norms. For this reason, legal validity entails legal applicability and legal bindingness. The chapter intends to show that these notions should be distinguished. It starts with the notion of membership to a legal system: which are the criteria to identify certain norms as belonging to a legal system? Several issues are relevant here, for instance, is the efficacy a necessary condition of membership of legal norms to legal systems? In which sense the authorization of another legal norm N2, also a member to the legal system LS, is a criterion of membership of a legal norm N1 to a legal system LS? And, is this authorization only a formal authorization or a material authorization too? Secondly, the notion of applicability is introduced: in legal practice there are applicable norms that are not members of a legal system, we can think on foreign legal norms, which are not part of the domestic legal system, but applicable in virtue of conflict of laws rules. Finally, the notion of bindingness of legal norms is presented. This notion refers to the question of justified normativity. In which conditions are legal norms apt to provide us reasons for action? Moreover, is legal normativity linked in some sense to robust normativity?The work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (PID2020-113472RB-I00 and PID2020-115041GB-I00) and by Generalitat of Catalonia (2017SGR 00823). We are immensely grateful to Professor Sean Coyle (University of Birmingham) for the comments on an earlier version of this manuscript and for the constructive feedback. We would also like to show our deep appreciation to Dr Samuele Chilovi (Instituto de Filosofía, CSIC, Madrid) and Dr Chiara Valentini (University of Bologna) for their comments and valuable suggestions.Oxford University Press2026202620242026info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPartinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10230/72552https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/9780191964718.003.0008reponame:Repositorio Digital de la UPFinstname:Universitat Pompeu FabraInglésBurazin L, Himma KE, Pino G (eds.). Jurisprudence in the mirror: the common law world meets the civil law world. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2024. p. 133-52. info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/2PE/PIF2020-115941GB-100info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/2PE/PID2020-113472RB-I00JJ Moreso, Ángeles Ródenas/Legal Validity and Other Properties of Legal Norms, Jurisprudence in the Mirror: The Common Law World Meets the Civil Law World/Luka Burazin (ed.) et al., 2024, reproduced by permission of Oxford University Press https://doi.org/10.1093/9780191964718.001.0001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/725522026-06-12T07:21:37Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Legal validity and other properties of legal norms
title Legal validity and other properties of legal norms
spellingShingle Legal validity and other properties of legal norms
Moreso, Josep Joan
Legal validity
Existence of norms
Lgal applicability
Legal bindingness
Legal system membership
Robust normativity
title_short Legal validity and other properties of legal norms
title_full Legal validity and other properties of legal norms
title_fullStr Legal validity and other properties of legal norms
title_full_unstemmed Legal validity and other properties of legal norms
title_sort Legal validity and other properties of legal norms
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Moreso, Josep Joan
Ródenas, Ángeles
author Moreso, Josep Joan
author_facet Moreso, Josep Joan
Ródenas, Ángeles
author_role author
author2 Ródenas, Ángeles
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Legal validity
Existence of norms
Lgal applicability
Legal bindingness
Legal system membership
Robust normativity
topic Legal validity
Existence of norms
Lgal applicability
Legal bindingness
Legal system membership
Robust normativity
description In Kelsen's very influential account, legal validity is the specific mode of existence of legal norms. For this reason, legal validity entails legal applicability and legal bindingness. The chapter intends to show that these notions should be distinguished. It starts with the notion of membership to a legal system: which are the criteria to identify certain norms as belonging to a legal system? Several issues are relevant here, for instance, is the efficacy a necessary condition of membership of legal norms to legal systems? In which sense the authorization of another legal norm N2, also a member to the legal system LS, is a criterion of membership of a legal norm N1 to a legal system LS? And, is this authorization only a formal authorization or a material authorization too? Secondly, the notion of applicability is introduced: in legal practice there are applicable norms that are not members of a legal system, we can think on foreign legal norms, which are not part of the domestic legal system, but applicable in virtue of conflict of laws rules. Finally, the notion of bindingness of legal norms is presented. This notion refers to the question of justified normativity. In which conditions are legal norms apt to provide us reasons for action? Moreover, is legal normativity linked in some sense to robust normativity?
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024
2026
2026
2026
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
format bookPart
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10230/72552
https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/9780191964718.003.0008
url https://hdl.handle.net/10230/72552
https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/9780191964718.003.0008
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Burazin L, Himma KE, Pino G (eds.). Jurisprudence in the mirror: the common law world meets the civil law world. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2024. p. 133-52.
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/2PE/PIF2020-115941GB-100
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/2PE/PID2020-113472RB-I00
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford University Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford University Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Digital de la UPF
instname:Universitat Pompeu Fabra
instname_str Universitat Pompeu Fabra
reponame_str Repositorio Digital de la UPF
collection Repositorio Digital de la UPF
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869411291296169984
score 15,811543