Legal validity and other properties of legal norms
In Kelsen's very influential account, legal validity is the specific mode of existence of legal norms. For this reason, legal validity entails legal applicability and legal bindingness. The chapter intends to show that these notions should be distinguished. It starts with the notion of memb...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | capítulo de libro |
| Estado: | Versión aceptada para publicación |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Pompeu Fabra |
| Repositorio: | Repositorio Digital de la UPF |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/72552 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10230/72552 https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/9780191964718.003.0008 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Legal validity Existence of norms Lgal applicability Legal bindingness Legal system membership Robust normativity |
| id |
ES_78d95f337fcaf1f22a12e95a7c8b09c6 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/72552 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Legal validity and other properties of legal normsMoreso, Josep JoanRódenas, ÁngelesLegal validityExistence of normsLgal applicabilityLegal bindingnessLegal system membershipRobust normativityIn Kelsen's very influential account, legal validity is the specific mode of existence of legal norms. For this reason, legal validity entails legal applicability and legal bindingness. The chapter intends to show that these notions should be distinguished. It starts with the notion of membership to a legal system: which are the criteria to identify certain norms as belonging to a legal system? Several issues are relevant here, for instance, is the efficacy a necessary condition of membership of legal norms to legal systems? In which sense the authorization of another legal norm N2, also a member to the legal system LS, is a criterion of membership of a legal norm N1 to a legal system LS? And, is this authorization only a formal authorization or a material authorization too? Secondly, the notion of applicability is introduced: in legal practice there are applicable norms that are not members of a legal system, we can think on foreign legal norms, which are not part of the domestic legal system, but applicable in virtue of conflict of laws rules. Finally, the notion of bindingness of legal norms is presented. This notion refers to the question of justified normativity. In which conditions are legal norms apt to provide us reasons for action? Moreover, is legal normativity linked in some sense to robust normativity?The work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (PID2020-113472RB-I00 and PID2020-115041GB-I00) and by Generalitat of Catalonia (2017SGR 00823). We are immensely grateful to Professor Sean Coyle (University of Birmingham) for the comments on an earlier version of this manuscript and for the constructive feedback. We would also like to show our deep appreciation to Dr Samuele Chilovi (Instituto de Filosofía, CSIC, Madrid) and Dr Chiara Valentini (University of Bologna) for their comments and valuable suggestions.Oxford University Press2026202620242026info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPartinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10230/72552https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/9780191964718.003.0008reponame:Repositorio Digital de la UPFinstname:Universitat Pompeu FabraInglésBurazin L, Himma KE, Pino G (eds.). Jurisprudence in the mirror: the common law world meets the civil law world. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2024. p. 133-52. info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/2PE/PIF2020-115941GB-100info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/2PE/PID2020-113472RB-I00JJ Moreso, Ángeles Ródenas/Legal Validity and Other Properties of Legal Norms, Jurisprudence in the Mirror: The Common Law World Meets the Civil Law World/Luka Burazin (ed.) et al., 2024, reproduced by permission of Oxford University Press https://doi.org/10.1093/9780191964718.001.0001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/725522026-06-12T07:21:37Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Legal validity and other properties of legal norms |
| title |
Legal validity and other properties of legal norms |
| spellingShingle |
Legal validity and other properties of legal norms Moreso, Josep Joan Legal validity Existence of norms Lgal applicability Legal bindingness Legal system membership Robust normativity |
| title_short |
Legal validity and other properties of legal norms |
| title_full |
Legal validity and other properties of legal norms |
| title_fullStr |
Legal validity and other properties of legal norms |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Legal validity and other properties of legal norms |
| title_sort |
Legal validity and other properties of legal norms |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Moreso, Josep Joan Ródenas, Ángeles |
| author |
Moreso, Josep Joan |
| author_facet |
Moreso, Josep Joan Ródenas, Ángeles |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Ródenas, Ángeles |
| author2_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Legal validity Existence of norms Lgal applicability Legal bindingness Legal system membership Robust normativity |
| topic |
Legal validity Existence of norms Lgal applicability Legal bindingness Legal system membership Robust normativity |
| description |
In Kelsen's very influential account, legal validity is the specific mode of existence of legal norms. For this reason, legal validity entails legal applicability and legal bindingness. The chapter intends to show that these notions should be distinguished. It starts with the notion of membership to a legal system: which are the criteria to identify certain norms as belonging to a legal system? Several issues are relevant here, for instance, is the efficacy a necessary condition of membership of legal norms to legal systems? In which sense the authorization of another legal norm N2, also a member to the legal system LS, is a criterion of membership of a legal norm N1 to a legal system LS? And, is this authorization only a formal authorization or a material authorization too? Secondly, the notion of applicability is introduced: in legal practice there are applicable norms that are not members of a legal system, we can think on foreign legal norms, which are not part of the domestic legal system, but applicable in virtue of conflict of laws rules. Finally, the notion of bindingness of legal norms is presented. This notion refers to the question of justified normativity. In which conditions are legal norms apt to provide us reasons for action? Moreover, is legal normativity linked in some sense to robust normativity? |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024 2026 2026 2026 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
| format |
bookPart |
| status_str |
acceptedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10230/72552 https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/9780191964718.003.0008 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10230/72552 https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/9780191964718.003.0008 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Burazin L, Himma KE, Pino G (eds.). Jurisprudence in the mirror: the common law world meets the civil law world. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2024. p. 133-52. info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/2PE/PIF2020-115941GB-100 info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/2PE/PID2020-113472RB-I00 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxford University Press |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxford University Press |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositorio Digital de la UPF instname:Universitat Pompeu Fabra |
| instname_str |
Universitat Pompeu Fabra |
| reponame_str |
Repositorio Digital de la UPF |
| collection |
Repositorio Digital de la UPF |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869411291296169984 |
| score |
15,811543 |