La Iglesia, la "sobornost’" de Khomiakov y la Revolución Rusa de 1917
After a brief introduction to the historical context that led the Russian Orthodox Church to convene the <i>Sobor</i>, the Council of 1917, this paper deals with Aleksiey Khomiakov’s concept of <i>sobornost</i>’ by placing it in the context of the Schmitt- Peterson debate. Th...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Navarra |
| Repositorio: | Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171/59297 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/59297 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Iglesia Iglesia Ortodoxa Rusa sobornost’ Khomiakov Revolución Rusa |
| Sumario: | After a brief introduction to the historical context that led the Russian Orthodox Church to convene the <i>Sobor</i>, the Council of 1917, this paper deals with Aleksiey Khomiakov’s concept of <i>sobornost</i>’ by placing it in the context of the Schmitt- Peterson debate. This debate, which remains dominant in the Western world, has determined how the Church in the west understands herself. In this regard, the heritage of Russian Christian thought can offer an alternative vision that is deeply rooted in the Church’s tradition yet also surprisingly current. In this way, this article hopes to offer an account of the history of the Russian Orthodox Church and her understanding of the world after the two events that determined its recent history: the Local Council of the Russian Orthodox Church and the Russian Revolution of 1917. |
|---|