The proof of law in the jurisdictional procedure.
Abstract.This article shows the results of a study about the evolution of the doctrine of comparative law with regard to the proof of law, taking into account – without exhaustiveness and very probably with omissions – some authors who are considered reasonably representative of legal systems with a...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
| País: | Uruguay |
| Institución: | Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| Repositorio: | LIBERI |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/7096 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/766 https://hdl.handle.net/10895/7096 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | comparative law principle of iura novit curia proof (law) theory of procedure derecho comparado principio iura novit curia prueba (derecho) teoría del proceso |
| id |
UY_48bf91ace656e3e47fd0d6e39efec2cf |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/7096 |
| network_acronym_str |
UY |
| network_name_str |
Uruguay |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Abal Oliú, Alejandro2016-01-262025-12-22T16:47:21Z2025-12-22T16:47:21Zhttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/76610.22235/rd.v0i8.766https://hdl.handle.net/10895/7096Abstract.This article shows the results of a study about the evolution of the doctrine of comparative law with regard to the proof of law, taking into account – without exhaustiveness and very probably with omissions – some authors who are considered reasonably representative of legal systems with an origin similar to the Uruguayan one, and, on the other hand, all those who have written in Uruguay for more than a century to that regard. It also gathers all the provisions of the Uruguayan domestic law and all the provisionsof private international law of conventional origin that are in force in this country. Finally, it shows what the author considers that might be a theoretical framework of the problem, that adjusted in particular to the Uruguayan law – though it might be applicable to other systems – may allow to understand and apply the corresponding provisions in a logical, coherent, systematic and without contradiction manner, and maybe suggest some guidelines that could contribute to new writings or complementary writings.Resumen. En este artículo se exponen los resultados de una investigación acerca de la evolución de la doctrina de derecho comparado respecto a la prueba del derecho, considerando, naturalmente que sin exhaustividad y seguramente con omisiones, a algunos autores que se entienden razonablemente representativos de ordenamientos jurídicos de similar origen al uruguayo y, por otro lado, a todos quienes en Uruguay han escrito durante más de un siglo a tal respecto. Se relevan asimismo todas las disposiciones del derecho interno de Uruguay y todas las disposiciones del derecho internacional privado de origen convencional que rigen para este país. Por último se expone lo que el autor entiende que puede ser un encuadre teórico del problema que, ajustándose particularmente el derecho uruguayo, aunque quizás sea trasladable a otros ordenamientos, permita interpretar y aplicar lógicamente, en forma coherente, sistemática y sin contradicciones, las disposiciones correspondientes, y eventualmente indicar lineamientos que podrían con fecundidad aportar a nuevas redacciones o redacciones complementarias.application/pdfspaUniversidad Católica del Uruguayhttps://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/766/757Derechos de autor 2016 Revista de Derechoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRevista de Derecho; No. 8 (2013): Revista de Derecho; 11-80Revista de Derecho; Núm. 8 (2013): Revista de Derecho; 11-80Revista de Derecho; N.º 8 (2013): Revista de Derecho; 11-802393-61931510-371410.22235/rd.v0i8reponame:LIBERIinstname:Universidad Católica del Uruguayinstacron:Universidad Católica del Uruguaycomparative lawprinciple of iura novit curiaproof (law)theory of procedurederecho comparadoprincipio iura novit curiaprueba (derecho)teoría del procesoThe proof of law in the jurisdictional procedure.La prueba del derecho en el proceso jurisdiccional.info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPapers evaluated by peersArtículos evaluados por paresAvaliados por paresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion10895/70962025-12-22 13:47:21.515metadata.onlyoai:liberi.ucu.edu.uy:10895/7096https://liberi.ucu.edu.uyInstitucionalhttps://liberi.ucu.edu.uy/Universidad privadahttps://www.ucu.edu.uy/https://liberi.ucu.edu.uy/server/oaifranco.pertusso@ucu.edu.uyUruguayopendoar:103422026-06-23T06:49:34.294257LIBERI - Universidad Católica del Uruguaytrue |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The proof of law in the jurisdictional procedure. La prueba del derecho en el proceso jurisdiccional. |
| title |
The proof of law in the jurisdictional procedure. |
| spellingShingle |
The proof of law in the jurisdictional procedure. Abal Oliú, Alejandro comparative law principle of iura novit curia proof (law) theory of procedure derecho comparado principio iura novit curia prueba (derecho) teoría del proceso |
| title_short |
The proof of law in the jurisdictional procedure. |
| title_full |
The proof of law in the jurisdictional procedure. |
| title_fullStr |
The proof of law in the jurisdictional procedure. |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The proof of law in the jurisdictional procedure. |
| title_sort |
The proof of law in the jurisdictional procedure. |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Abal Oliú, Alejandro |
| author |
Abal Oliú, Alejandro |
| author_facet |
Abal Oliú, Alejandro |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.en-US.fl_str_mv |
comparative law principle of iura novit curia proof (law) theory of procedure |
| topic |
comparative law principle of iura novit curia proof (law) theory of procedure derecho comparado principio iura novit curia prueba (derecho) teoría del proceso |
| dc.subject.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
derecho comparado principio iura novit curia prueba (derecho) teoría del proceso |
| description |
Abstract.This article shows the results of a study about the evolution of the doctrine of comparative law with regard to the proof of law, taking into account – without exhaustiveness and very probably with omissions – some authors who are considered reasonably representative of legal systems with an origin similar to the Uruguayan one, and, on the other hand, all those who have written in Uruguay for more than a century to that regard. It also gathers all the provisions of the Uruguayan domestic law and all the provisionsof private international law of conventional origin that are in force in this country. Finally, it shows what the author considers that might be a theoretical framework of the problem, that adjusted in particular to the Uruguayan law – though it might be applicable to other systems – may allow to understand and apply the corresponding provisions in a logical, coherent, systematic and without contradiction manner, and maybe suggest some guidelines that could contribute to new writings or complementary writings. |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-12-22T16:47:21Z |
| dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-12-22T16:47:21Z |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-01-26 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Papers evaluated by peers |
| dc.type.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Artículos evaluados por pares |
| dc.type.pt-PT.fl_str_mv |
Avaliados por pares |
| dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/766 10.22235/rd.v0i8.766 |
| dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10895/7096 |
| url |
https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/766 https://hdl.handle.net/10895/7096 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.22235/rd.v0i8.766 |
| dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ucu.edu.uy/index.php/revistadederecho/article/view/766/757 |
| dc.rights.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2016 Revista de Derecho |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2016 Revista de Derecho |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| dc.source.en-US.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Derecho; No. 8 (2013): Revista de Derecho; 11-80 |
| dc.source.es-ES.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Derecho; Núm. 8 (2013): Revista de Derecho; 11-80 |
| dc.source.pt-PT.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Derecho; N.º 8 (2013): Revista de Derecho; 11-80 |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
2393-6193 1510-3714 10.22235/rd.v0i8 reponame:LIBERI instname:Universidad Católica del Uruguay instacron:Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| instname_str |
Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| instacron_str |
Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| institution |
Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| reponame_str |
LIBERI |
| collection |
LIBERI |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
LIBERI - Universidad Católica del Uruguay |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
franco.pertusso@ucu.edu.uy |
| _version_ |
1870824008113455104 |
| score |
14.965132 |