Uterocervical angle or cervical length for prediction of impending preterm delivery in symptomatic patients

Objective: To compare the uterocervical angle with the cervical length in the prediction of impending preterm delivery in symptomatic patients. Design: Case-control study. Institution: Central Hospital “Dr. Urquinaona”, Maracaibo, Venezuela. Participants: Patients with preterm delivery within 7 days...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Reyna-Villasmil, Eduardo, Mejía-Montilla, Jorly, Reyna-Villasmil, Nadia, Torres-Cepeda, Duly, Rondón-Tapia, Martha, Briceño-Pérez, Carlos
Tipo de documento: artigo
Estado:Versão publicada
Data de publicação:2020
País:Perú
Recursos:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
Repositório:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
Idioma:espanhol
inglês
OAI Identifier:oai:ginecologiayobstetricia.pe:article/2282
Acesso em linha:https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/2282
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Uterocervical angle
Cervical length
Preterm delivery
Prediction
Ángulo uterocervical
Longitud cervical
Parto pretérmino
Predicción
Descrição
Resumo:Objective: To compare the uterocervical angle with the cervical length in the prediction of impending preterm delivery in symptomatic patients. Design: Case-control study. Institution: Central Hospital “Dr. Urquinaona”, Maracaibo, Venezuela. Participants: Patients with preterm delivery within 7 days (group A) and pregnant women with preterm delivery beyond 7 days (group B). Methods: At the time of diagnosis, the patients were evaluated using transvaginal ultrasound and were followed until delivery. Main outcome measures: General characteristics, uterocervical angle, cervical length, impending preterm delivery, and prognostic efficacy. Results: 326 patients were included, 75 women presented impending preterm delivery (group A) and 251 patients were considered as controls (group B). The patients in group A had significantly higher values of the uterocervical angle and lower cervical length compared to the patients in group B (p <0.0001). The uterocervical angle showed an area under the curve of 0.864, while the value of the area under the curve of cervical length was 0.985. The difference in the discrimination ability between the areas under the curve of each test was significant (p <0.0001). Conclusion: The uterocervical angle is not greater than the cervical length in predicting impending preterm delivery in symptomatic patients.