Uterocervical angle or cervical length for prediction of impending preterm delivery in symptomatic patients

Objective: To compare the uterocervical angle with the cervical length in the prediction of impending preterm delivery in symptomatic patients. Design: Case-control study. Institution: Central Hospital “Dr. Urquinaona”, Maracaibo, Venezuela. Participants: Patients with preterm delivery within 7 days...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Reyna-Villasmil, Eduardo, Mejía-Montilla, Jorly, Reyna-Villasmil, Nadia, Torres-Cepeda, Duly, Rondón-Tapia, Martha, Briceño-Pérez, Carlos
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2020
País:Perú
Institución:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
Repositorio:Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
Idioma:español
inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ginecologiayobstetricia.pe:article/2282
Acceso en línea:https://ginecologiayobstetricia.pe/index.php/RPGO/article/view/2282
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Uterocervical angle
Cervical length
Preterm delivery
Prediction
Ángulo uterocervical
Longitud cervical
Parto pretérmino
Predicción
Descripción
Sumario:Objective: To compare the uterocervical angle with the cervical length in the prediction of impending preterm delivery in symptomatic patients. Design: Case-control study. Institution: Central Hospital “Dr. Urquinaona”, Maracaibo, Venezuela. Participants: Patients with preterm delivery within 7 days (group A) and pregnant women with preterm delivery beyond 7 days (group B). Methods: At the time of diagnosis, the patients were evaluated using transvaginal ultrasound and were followed until delivery. Main outcome measures: General characteristics, uterocervical angle, cervical length, impending preterm delivery, and prognostic efficacy. Results: 326 patients were included, 75 women presented impending preterm delivery (group A) and 251 patients were considered as controls (group B). The patients in group A had significantly higher values of the uterocervical angle and lower cervical length compared to the patients in group B (p <0.0001). The uterocervical angle showed an area under the curve of 0.864, while the value of the area under the curve of cervical length was 0.985. The difference in the discrimination ability between the areas under the curve of each test was significant (p <0.0001). Conclusion: The uterocervical angle is not greater than the cervical length in predicting impending preterm delivery in symptomatic patients.