Peligros en la tipificación de Recomendaciones como Práctica Anticompetitiva en la Ley peruana
On this paper, the author disserts on the notion of recommendations as a method of collusion. First, he approaches it based on comparative law (Europe and Latin-America) and precedent case law from INDECOPI, followed by defining how the term is (and should be) understood in Peruvian regulations as a...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2015 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | PUCP-Institucional |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/123645 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/15651/16088 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Recommendations Horizontal Collusion Vertical Collusion Cartels - Anticompetitive Practices Antitrust Free Competition Indecopi Recomendaciones Colusión Horizontal Colusión Vertical Carteles Conductas Anticompetitivas Derecho de la Competencia Libre Competencia https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.00 |
| Sumario: | On this paper, the author disserts on the notion of recommendations as a method of collusion. First, he approaches it based on comparative law (Europe and Latin-America) and precedent case law from INDECOPI, followed by defining how the term is (and should be) understood in Peruvian regulations as a horizontal agreement (cartel). It also analyzes in which instances said application has been inaccurate and the issues surrounding it. Finally, the author illustrates the complexity of framing recommendations as vertical agreements in the absence of “collusion between two or more parties” |
|---|