Civil Law Versus Binding Judicial Precedent: Dialogues with Academics from (Latin) America and Europe
This paper addresses binding judicial precedent. The semi- structured interview was used as a methodology for execution and a total of thirty-two academics, from ten countries in Latin America and Europe, participated of it. The results are structured around the arguments for and against precedent a...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Estado: | Versão publicada |
| Data de publicação: | 2021 |
| País: | Perú |
| Recursos: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositório: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Idioma: | espanhol |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22663 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22663 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | Judicial precedent Precedent application Precedent in civil law Precedent in common law Precedente judicial Seguimiento del precedente Precedente en el derecho civil Precedente en el common law |
| Resumo: | This paper addresses binding judicial precedent. The semi- structured interview was used as a methodology for execution and a total of thirty-two academics, from ten countries in Latin America and Europe, participated of it. The results are structured around the arguments for and against precedent as a theoretical position; to narrate how vertex courts and inferior courts behave on precedents; and finally, to know the roadblocks that prevent following precedent correctly. |
|---|