El civil law frente al precedente judicial vinculante: diálogos con académicos de América Latina y Europa
This paper addresses binding judicial precedent. The semi- structured interview was used as a methodology for execution and a total of thirty-two academics, from ten countries in Latin America and Europe, participated of it. The results are structured around the arguments for and against precedent a...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2021 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | PUCP-Institucional |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/186405 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22663/23229 https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22663/23500 https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22663/23501 https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202102.004 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Judicial precedent Precedent application Precedent in civil law Precedent in common law Precedente judicial Seguimiento del precedente Precedente en el derecho civil Precedente en el common law https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01 |
| Sumario: | This paper addresses binding judicial precedent. The semi- structured interview was used as a methodology for execution and a total of thirty-two academics, from ten countries in Latin America and Europe, participated of it. The results are structured around the arguments for and against precedent as a theoretical position; to narrate how vertex courts and inferior courts behave on precedents; and finally, to know the roadblocks that prevent following precedent correctly. |
|---|