Overcoming the ‘Chronic Doubt’: History of Psychology and Argentinian Psychologists’ Training and Education in the Context of Latin-American Psychology
The present study presents an empirical analysis of the relevance of psychologists’ historical education within the framework of Latin American psychology. The ‘chronic doubt’ about the formative aim of historiography is first characterized. The ways in which such historiography is a central input i...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2018 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16496 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/psicologia/article/view/16496 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | history of psychology teaching of psychology education in psychology critical thinking Latin-American psychology historia de la psicología enseñanza de la psicología formación en psicología pensamiento crítico psicología latinoamericana histoire de la psychologie enseignement de la psychologie formation en psychologie la pensée critique psychologie latino-américaine história da psicologia ensino de psicologia treinamento em psicologia pensamento critico Psicologia latino-americana |
| Sumario: | The present study presents an empirical analysis of the relevance of psychologists’ historical education within the framework of Latin American psychology. The ‘chronic doubt’ about the formative aim of historiography is first characterized. The ways in which such historiography is a central input in Latin American and Argentinian psychologists’ training and education is then described. The results of a descriptive, mixed socio-bibliometric analysis of the literature used as readings (n = 798) in undergraduate historical courses at Argentinian psychology programs are presented. Findings indicate a marked predominance of texts and scholarship by Argentinian authors, a marked scarcity of Latin American authors and themes, and a problematic depiction of psychology’s historical pluralism. We conclude on the implications of such results for a critical history in the Latin American psychologists’ education, and on the need to contextualize local history in regional history of science. |
|---|