Jurisprudential Analysis of Reserved Advantages Clauses Agreed in the Spanish Collective Bargaining
In this article the author develops a jurisprudential analysis of the right to negative freedom of association, as an essential part of the right to freedom of association, and how certain agreements, concluded within the framework of collective bargaining, contain provisions that go against the pri...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/18843 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/18843 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Collective bargaining Negative freedom of association Discrimination Union security clauses Advantages reserved clauses Labor union Unitary representation Negociación colectiva Libertad sindical negativa Discriminación Cláusulas de seguridad sindical Cláusulas de ventajas reservadas Sindicato Representación unitaria |
| Sumario: | In this article the author develops a jurisprudential analysis of the right to negative freedom of association, as an essential part of the right to freedom of association, and how certain agreements, concluded within the framework of collective bargaining, contain provisions that go against the principle non-discrimination. Such agreements are declared null and void, and sometimes are admitted and incorporated into the constitutionality and legality. Based on typical cases will be discussed in which situations the agreements concluded by unions violate the right to negative freedom of association of the unaffiliated and become a discriminatory act and an unjustified pressure to join a union. |
|---|