Problems with the performance of evidence in virtual audiences
In a pandemic, the hearings, in most cases, have been held virtually. However, although there have been good results, it is not an obstacle to wonder if these can be carried out with the same effectiveness as a face-to-face session. In this sense, we have considered analyzing the comparative and nat...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2021 |
| País: | Perú |
| Recursos: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24751 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/24751 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Hearing of evidence Virtuality Psychology of testimony Civil process Procedural immediacy Audiencia de pruebas Virtualidad Psicología del testimonio inmediación procesal |
| Resumo: | In a pandemic, the hearings, in most cases, have been held virtually. However, although there have been good results, it is not an obstacle to wonder if these can be carried out with the same effectiveness as a face-to-face session. In this sense, we have considered analyzing the comparative and national legislation on the hearing of evidence. Next, we have identified the problems with the virtual test audience; specifically, we have focused on the psychology of testimony and how its development can be influenced by virtuality. Finally, we have suggested proposals to improve the service of our administration of justice. |
|---|