La protección frente al despido en la evolución de la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Constitucional
The protection against dismissal in the evolution of the Constitutional Court jurisprudenceThis paper is based on the analysis of the job security schemes embodied in the Constitutions of 1979 and 1993, so as to point out the evolution of the protection granted by the constitutional system against u...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2012 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2843 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/2843 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | 1993 Constitution job security protection dismissals reinstatement restitutory protection indemnification compensatory protection Constitutional Court San Salvador Protocol fundamental rights reasonableness and legal description Constitución de 1993 estabilidad laboral protección despidos reposición tutela restitutoria indemnización tutela resarcitoria Tribunal Constitucional Protocolo San Salvador derechos fundamentales razonabilidad y tipicidad |
| Sumario: | The protection against dismissal in the evolution of the Constitutional Court jurisprudenceThis paper is based on the analysis of the job security schemes embodied in the Constitutions of 1979 and 1993, so as to point out the evolution of the protection granted by the constitutional system against unlawful dismissal and the legal application thereof to the models of restitutory protection (reinstatement) or compensatory protection (indemnification). Then, an analysis is made with respect to the options covered in this field by the international treaties executed by Peru and the evolution of different constitutional case law. Thus, judgments in which restitutory protection was initially oriented to outlaw the dismissal that violates fundamental rights are examined, in comparison to recent rulings in which such protection is granted against unlawful dismissal, resulting in a labor stability model different from the one set forth by the 1993 Constitution. |
|---|