Employment security: legal premises and narrative orthodoxies
The authors present a logical-legal analysis of the main arguments contained in the allegations that have been exposed in Peru in favor of implementing the reform of the employment security regulation downwards. Thus, since the period from the publication of the known judgments of the Constitutional...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21791 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/21791 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Dismissal Employment stability Replacement Reinstatement Compensation Reform Fundamental rights Despido Estabilidad laboral Reposición Indemnización Reforma Derechos fundamentales |
| Sumario: | The authors present a logical-legal analysis of the main arguments contained in the allegations that have been exposed in Peru in favor of implementing the reform of the employment security regulation downwards. Thus, since the period from the publication of the known judgments of the Constitutional Court on reinstatement, until the current debate raised after the unilateral approval of the National Productivity and Competitiveness Policy, the essay identifies the implicit and explicit arguments of those who propose a review of the regime of protection against dismissal. All this with the purpose of analyzing the constitutional basis of such argumentation from the tension that exists between the principles of freedom of Enterprise and employment stability. |
|---|