On the significance of the effectiveness and productivity criteria of the new Criminal Procedure System
The brand new Criminal Procedure Code, as a legal tool for an adversarial accusatory trait, aims to ensure that the operators of the criminal justice system behave with objectivity and professionalism, as part of the formula that characterizes it is to be agile, very swift, and mainly based on the p...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2012 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Poder Judicial del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/280 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/280 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Judgment Nullity Reasonable time Detention Dismissal Stubborn Cessation of prison Historical witness Preliminary proceedings Retest Inquisitorial system Accusatory Additional charges Labeling aproach Juzgamiento Nulidad Plazo razonable Prisión preventiva Sobreseimiento Contumaz Cese de prisión Testigo histórico Diligencias preliminares Reexamen Sistema inquisitivo Acusatorio Acomplementaria Labelling aproach |
| Sumario: | The brand new Criminal Procedure Code, as a legal tool for an adversarial accusatory trait, aims to ensure that the operators of the criminal justice system behave with objectivity and professionalism, as part of the formula that characterizes it is to be agile, very swift, and mainly based on the principle of judicial economy, considering the cost-benefit for both the State and the system operator, this under indicators of efficiency, effectiveness and productivity; while who gives life to this body of law is the legal practitioner, the same one who should not necessarily be overly formalistic, but based on reasoning of transcendence and social reality, in order that users achive a real, serious and transparent legal certainty, i.e. social peace with justice; hence the observations that arise in this paper, aim to measure how effective or efficient both the actions and the decisions of the judges and prosecutors are in judicial work |
|---|