The principle of judicial non interference in arbitrations: Comments on Article 3 of the Peruvian Arbitration Law
The virtues of arbitration depend on the principle of judicial non-interference in its proceedings and on a limited regime of subsequent judicial control of arbitrations. However, there is a lot of confusion about the articulation of the different procedural control channels applicable to arbitratio...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2021 |
| País: | Perú |
| Recursos: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23905 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/23905 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Arbitraje Laudos Amparo Anulación de laudos Terceros Poder Judicial Jurisprudencia constitucional Jurisprudencia comparada Perú Arbitration Awards Annulment of awards Third parties Judicial Power Constitutional jurisprudence Comparative jurisprudence Peru |
| Resumo: | The virtues of arbitration depend on the principle of judicial non-interference in its proceedings and on a limited regime of subsequent judicial control of arbitrations. However, there is a lot of confusion about the articulation of the different procedural control channels applicable to arbitrations, the timing of their activation and their scope. Article 3 of the Arbitration Act establishes the principle of judicial non-interference, but it needs to be understood within the entire framework of existing procedural defenses. For these purposes, the history of national and comparative jurisprudence plays an extremely relevant role. |
|---|