Differences between the Framingham and D:A:D risk models for cardiovascular risk assessment in HIV-positive patients on antiretroviral therapy: an experience in a Colombian Caribbean population

Objective: To assess the five- and ten-year cardiovascular disease risk in HIV-positive patients on antiretroviral therapy, using the Framingham risk score and the Data collection on adverse effects of anti-HIV drugs (D:A:D) study. Materials and methods: An observational prospective cross-sectional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Pinilla Sogamoso, Jorge Luis, Viloria Madrid, Johan Alfonso, Lozada Martinez, Ivan David, Hernández Anaya, Oscar Daniel, Cardenas Castañeda, Felipe Andrés, Llamas Nieves, Andrés Elías, Bolaño Romero, María Paz, Picón Jaimes, Yelson Alejandro
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:Perú
Institución:Universidad de San Martín de Porres
Repositorio:Horizonte médico
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:horizontemedico.usmp.edu.pe:article/1671
Acceso en línea:https://horizontemedico.usmp.edu.pe/index.php/horizontemed/article/view/1671
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:HIV infections
Cardiovascular models
Cardiovascular risk
Highly active antiretroviral therapy
Caribbean región
Infecciones por VIH
Modelos cardiovasculares
Riesgo cardiovascular
Terapia antirretroviral altamente activa
Región del Caribe
Descripción
Sumario:Objective: To assess the five- and ten-year cardiovascular disease risk in HIV-positive patients on antiretroviral therapy, using the Framingham risk score and the Data collection on adverse effects of anti-HIV drugs (D:A:D) study. Materials and methods: An observational prospective cross-sectional study. HIV-positive patients on antiretroviral treatment from a referral center for HIV patients were included in the study between January 1 and April 30, 2019. A five- and ten-year cardiovascular risk assessment was performed using the Framingham risk score and the D:A:D study. Additionally, both risk models were compared through statistical models. Results: The study population consisted of 159 patients with a mean age of 48.90 years ± 9.90. The mean cardiovascular risk according to the five-year Framingham risk score was 2.70 % ± 2.80, the ten-year Framingham risk score was 6.10 % ± 5.70, the five-year D:A:D study was 3.50 % ± 4.10, the ten-year D:A:D study was 6.90 % ± 7.70, and the ten-year Framingham risk score recalculated for Colombia (multiplied by 0.75) was 4.50 % ± 4.20. Using a logistic regression model, it was determined that the ten-year D:A:D study provided the greatest number of variables significantly related to a high cardiovascular risk. Conclusions: The study showed a significant difference between the risk models. Both the five- and ten-year D:A:D study provided a better cardiovascular disease risk estimation than the five- and ten-year Framingham model.