Debates sobre bicameralidad: perspectivas y retos
This round table discussion examines the return to bicameralism, a reform that has raised new doubts regarding its viability. Although Peru was governed under this system in the past, the main current criticism lies in the fact that this measure was approved despite its rejection by the population i...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | PUCP-Institucional |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/206900 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/33571/28768 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14657/206900 https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.202502.018 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Bicameralism Constitutional reform Senate Deputies Balance of Powers Constitutional law Legitimacy Bicameralidad Reforma constitucional Senado Diputados Equilibrio de poderes Derecho Constitucional Legitimidad https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01 |
| Sumario: | This round table discussion examines the return to bicameralism, a reform that has raised new doubts regarding its viability. Although Peru was governed under this system in the past, the main current criticism lies in the fact that this measure was approved despite its rejection by the population in a referendum, which seriously compromises its legitimacy. The authors agree that this change is risky: it alters the balance of powers in favor of the Parliament, increases public spending, and does not ensure faster processes. Ultimately, this reform does not resolve the main problem: Parliament’s lack of representation, a debate from which the reader may draw their own conclusions. |
|---|