English criminal system and mental states inference rules
Although the discussion about mens rea is still in an incipient state, English criminal law provides a different perspective of analysis, which establishes inference rules of the mental states before defining the conceptual level. The idea that a theory of mental states will only be satisfactory if...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2018 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20293 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/20293 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Mens Rea Oblique Intention Foresight Subjective Recklessness Strict Liability Mens Rea Presumption Inference Intención Oblicua Previsión Temeridad Subjetiva Responsabilidad Estricta Presunción de Mens Rea Inferencia de Estados Mentales |
| Sumario: | Although the discussion about mens rea is still in an incipient state, English criminal law provides a different perspective of analysis, which establishes inference rules of the mental states before defining the conceptual level. The idea that a theory of mental states will only be satisfactory if it allows or makes viable its application in criminal proceedings can constitute a contribution of English jurisprudential development to the dogmatics of continental criminal law. |
|---|