Argentinian adaptation of the new Social Dominance Orientation scale (SDO7)

The present work adapted the seventh scale of Social Dominance in Argentina in its two versions: long (16 items) and short (eight items; Ho et al., 2015). The psychometric properties of the scale were studied and its factorial structure was evaluated. We analyzed differences in SDO as regards sex, a...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Casalá, María Belén, Delfino, Gisela
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:Perú
Recursos:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23933
Acesso em linha:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/psicologia/article/view/23933
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Social Dominance Scale
SDO7 Scale
Group hierarchies
Inequality
Escala de dominancia social
Escala SDO7
Jerarquías grupales
Desigualdad
Échelle de dominance sociale
Échelle SDO7
Hiérarchies de groupes
Inégalités
Escala de dominância social
Hierarquias de grupos
Desigualdade
Descrição
Resumo:The present work adapted the seventh scale of Social Dominance in Argentina in its two versions: long (16 items) and short (eight items; Ho et al., 2015). The psychometric properties of the scale were studied and its factorial structure was evaluated. We analyzed differences in SDO as regards sex, age, socioeconomic self-positioning and political orientation. We worked with a convenience sample (n = 1573, short scale; n = 590, long scale) between 18 and 60 years. The scale shows evidence of reliability consistent with the theory. The factor analysis confirms the bifactorial structure of the scale, finding two dimensions: SDO-Dominance and SDO-E Egalitarianism. A positive correlation was found between right-wing political self-positioning and SDO.