Hazards on sanctioning the Recommendations as an anti-competitive practice in the Peruvian Law
On this paper, the author disserts on the notion of recommendations as a method of collusion. First, he approaches it based on comparative law (Europe and Latin-America) and precedent case law from INDECOPI, followed by defining how the term is (and should be) understood in Peruvian regulations as a...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | artigo |
| Estado: | Versão publicada |
| Data de publicação: | 2015 |
| País: | Perú |
| Recursos: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositório: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Idioma: | espanhol |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15651 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/15651 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | recommendations Horizontal collusion Vertical collusion Cartels - Anticompetitive practices Antitrust Free competition INDECOPI Recomendaciones Colusión horizontal Colusión vertical Carteles Conductas anticompetitivas Derecho de la Competencia Libre competencia |
| Resumo: | On this paper, the author disserts on the notion of recommendations as a method of collusion. First, he approaches it based on comparative law (Europe and Latin-America) and precedent case law from INDECOPI, followed by defining how the term is (and should be) understood in Peruvian regulations as a horizontal agreement (cartel). It also analyzes in which instances said application has been inaccurate and the issues surrounding it. Finally, the author illustrates the complexity of framing recommendations as vertical agreements in the absence of “collusion between two or more parties” |
|---|