Qué + término malsonante en función de comentario intensificador de la aserción
The construction [qué + swear word] appears in different discursive contexts. It can act as an independent statement, as a complex interjective variant, in reactive interventions, or is integrated within an utterance, occupying peripheral positions. In the latter context, it develops procedural cont...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | Perú |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | PUCP-Institucional |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.pucp.edu.pe:20.500.14657/194670 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/lexis/article/view/27037/25329 https://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/194670 https://doi.org/10.18800/lexis.202301.001 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Interjection Swear word Comment Intensification Interjección Término malsonante Comentario Intensificación https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#6.02.06 |
| Sumario: | The construction [qué + swear word] appears in different discursive contexts. It can act as an independent statement, as a complex interjective variant, in reactive interventions, or is integrated within an utterance, occupying peripheral positions. In the latter context, it develops procedural contents similar to those of discourse markers: specifically, it develops a meaning of reformulation and another one of reconsideration, in which it adds an argumentative counterorientation to what is expected by the listener. This paper analyses its functions from a linguistic-pragmatic perspective which takes into account the macrosyntactic functions of the construction. |
|---|