LA REGLA DE INFERENCIA EN LOS ARGUMENTOS DE LA SENTENCIA CONSTITUCIONAL
When we receive a sentence that favors us, few give themselves to the task of analyzing the argumentation that served as the basis for dictating it. However, when a sentence is issued against our claims, there is automatically a desire to know the reasons they adopted to resolve the issue. If the se...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | tesis de maestría |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit |
| Repositorio: | Repositorio Institucional Aramara de la UAN |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dspace.uan.mx:123456789/1146 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://dspace.uan.mx:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1146 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | sentencia constitucional argumentación sentencia constitutional sentence argumentation sentence CIENCIAS SOCIALES [5] |
| Sumario: | When we receive a sentence that favors us, few give themselves to the task of analyzing the argumentation that served as the basis for dictating it. However, when a sentence is issued against our claims, there is automatically a desire to know the reasons they adopted to resolve the issue. If the sentence can be challenged through some extraordinary means, there is the possibility that this decision will be rectified, or ratified confirming the primary reasons, either by reinforcing them or claiming others in the same sense. |
|---|