The Claims of Guardianship in the Colombian Legal System
The article describes and analyzes the relationship between how to present the claims of the tutelage and influence it generates in the judge’s decision. Standard wording of the claims of guardianship, based on the structural design of fundamental rights is prescribed, awareness of the principle of...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO |
| Repositorio: | Cuestiones Constitucionales. Revista Mexicana de Derecho Constitucional |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11875 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/cuestiones-constitucionales/article/view/11875 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Fundamental Rights Judge Claims Arguments derechos fundamentales juez pretensiones argumentos |
| Sumario: | The article describes and analyzes the relationship between how to present the claims of the tutelage and influence it generates in the judge’s decision. Standard wording of the claims of guardianship, based on the structural design of fundamental rights is prescribed, awareness of the principle of consonance, limited rationality of the judge, and the meta-legal principle of clarity and simplicity. |
|---|