History and Plasticity. On the Contingente History of Capitalism in Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari
Deleuze and Guattari write in The Anti Oedipus that it is correct to retrospectively understand all history in the light of Capitalism. Therefore, the lines that constitute this paper are intended to review that retrospective in considering three instances as guidelines: first, the plasticities of t...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO Y DE ESTUDIOS SUPERIORES DE MONTERREY |
| Repositorio: | En-claves del pensamiento |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.enclavesdelpensamiento.mx:article/227 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.enclavesdelpensamiento.mx/index.php/enclaves/article/view/227 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Deleuze Guattari Nietzsche refrain capitalism ritornelo capitalismo |
| Sumario: | Deleuze and Guattari write in The Anti Oedipus that it is correct to retrospectively understand all history in the light of Capitalism. Therefore, the lines that constitute this paper are intended to review that retrospective in considering three instances as guidelines: first, the plasticities of the refrain; second, three conceptual characters (savages, barbarians and the civilized); and, third, Nietzsche’s ethnology laid out in the Genealogy of Morals. All these are considered in order to understand the two limits set by the joint work of Deleuze-Guattari: Capitalism and schizophrenia. |
|---|