Teoría y práctica de la relación dialéctica entre desarrollo y migración
In this paper we analyze the theoretical and practical aspects underlying the relationship between development and international migration taking into consideration the perspective of the labor-sending underdeveloped countries from a political economy of development approach. Against the unidirectio...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2007 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas |
| Repositorio: | Repositorio Institucional Caxcán |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:http://ricaxcan.uaz.edu.mx:20.500.11845/112 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11845/112 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | CIENCIAS SOCIALES [5] info:eu-repo/classification/Migración y desarrollo info:eu-repo/classification/Economía política del desarrollo info:eu-repo/classification/Migración forzada info:eu-repo/classification/Transformación social info:eu-repo/classification/Migración México-Estados Unidos |
| Sumario: | In this paper we analyze the theoretical and practical aspects underlying the relationship between development and international migration taking into consideration the perspective of the labor-sending underdeveloped countries from a political economy of development approach. Against the unidirectional formulation of the migration-development nexus adopted by the major international organizations, this perspective offers a theoretical alternative based on the assumption that migrants and their resources, correspondingly represent the agency and instrument for development. Our purpose is both to disentangle the role assigned to migrants in the accumulation and regional integration processes leaded by the labor-receiving developed countries, and to unravel the migrant’s contribution in supporting the precarious socioeconomic stability of their countries of origin. We take as an empirical referent for our analysis the case of Mexico, the world’s leading migrant-exporter and remittance-receiving country. |
|---|