DELIBERATION, ACTION AND NORMATIVITY. Comments on Martin Seel’s “The Ability to Deliberate”
In this paper I comment on several aspects of Martin Seel’s paper “The Ability to Deliberate”, mainly on his claims that deliberation is a form of action, on his not very clear distinction between deliberation and thought, and on the relation between normativity and deliberation. There are also some...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2009 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |
| Repositorio: | Redalyc-UNAM |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:redalyc.org:323028512006 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=323028512006 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Filosofía reasons normativity Deliberation practical reasoning theoretical reasoning |
| id |
MX_2f05b4ede7c301afb4e072e8be81a5dc |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:redalyc.org:323028512006 |
| network_acronym_str |
MX |
| network_name_str |
México |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
DELIBERATION, ACTION AND NORMATIVITY. Comments on Martin Seel’s “The Ability to Deliberate”Gustavo Ortiz MillánFilosofíareasonsnormativityDeliberationpractical reasoningtheoretical reasoningIn this paper I comment on several aspects of Martin Seel’s paper “The Ability to Deliberate”, mainly on his claims that deliberation is a form of action, on his not very clear distinction between deliberation and thought, and on the relation between normativity and deliberation. There are also some comments on practical and theoretical reasoning, as well as on Seel’s characterization of reasons.Universidad Panamericana2009info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdf0188-6649https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=323028512006Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía (México) Num.36reponame:Redalyc-UNAMinstname:Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Méxicoinstacron:UNAMenhttp://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3230Tópicos, Revista de Filosofíainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:redalyc.org:3230285120062025-09-03T18:09:54Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
DELIBERATION, ACTION AND NORMATIVITY. Comments on Martin Seel’s “The Ability to Deliberate” |
| title |
DELIBERATION, ACTION AND NORMATIVITY. Comments on Martin Seel’s “The Ability to Deliberate” |
| spellingShingle |
DELIBERATION, ACTION AND NORMATIVITY. Comments on Martin Seel’s “The Ability to Deliberate” Gustavo Ortiz Millán Filosofía reasons normativity Deliberation practical reasoning theoretical reasoning |
| title_short |
DELIBERATION, ACTION AND NORMATIVITY. Comments on Martin Seel’s “The Ability to Deliberate” |
| title_full |
DELIBERATION, ACTION AND NORMATIVITY. Comments on Martin Seel’s “The Ability to Deliberate” |
| title_fullStr |
DELIBERATION, ACTION AND NORMATIVITY. Comments on Martin Seel’s “The Ability to Deliberate” |
| title_full_unstemmed |
DELIBERATION, ACTION AND NORMATIVITY. Comments on Martin Seel’s “The Ability to Deliberate” |
| title_sort |
DELIBERATION, ACTION AND NORMATIVITY. Comments on Martin Seel’s “The Ability to Deliberate” |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Gustavo Ortiz Millán |
| author |
Gustavo Ortiz Millán |
| author_facet |
Gustavo Ortiz Millán |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Filosofía reasons normativity Deliberation practical reasoning theoretical reasoning |
| topic |
Filosofía reasons normativity Deliberation practical reasoning theoretical reasoning |
| description |
In this paper I comment on several aspects of Martin Seel’s paper “The Ability to Deliberate”, mainly on his claims that deliberation is a form of action, on his not very clear distinction between deliberation and thought, and on the relation between normativity and deliberation. There are also some comments on practical and theoretical reasoning, as well as on Seel’s characterization of reasons. |
| publishDate |
2009 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
0188-6649 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=323028512006 |
| identifier_str_mv |
0188-6649 |
| url |
https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=323028512006 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
en |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
en |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3230 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Panamericana |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Panamericana |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía (México) Num.36 reponame:Redalyc-UNAM instname:Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México instacron:UNAM |
| instname_str |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |
| instacron_str |
UNAM |
| institution |
UNAM |
| reponame_str |
Redalyc-UNAM |
| collection |
Redalyc-UNAM |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1858174807897538560 |
| score |
14,964248 |