Three criticisms of Heidegger to the foundations of Husserl’s phenomenology
The purpose of this work is the elucidation of the problems of the Heidegger´s interpretation that of humans, logic and the truth which have stablish a pattern to some current thoughts. We have used the first edition of the Logische Untersuchungen to adapt to the first Husserl´s analyzes and, in par...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2018 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla |
| Repositorio: | Repositorio Institucional de Acceso Abierto RIAA-BUAP |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorioinstitucional.buap.mx:20.500.12371/4224 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://www.apps.buap.mx/ojs3/index.php/tlamelaua/article/view/594 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12371/4224 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Anthropocentrism; truth; power; man; subjectivity Antropocentrismo; verdad; poder; hombre; subjetividad |
| Sumario: | The purpose of this work is the elucidation of the problems of the Heidegger´s interpretation that of humans, logic and the truth which have stablish a pattern to some current thoughts. We have used the first edition of the Logische Untersuchungen to adapt to the first Husserl´s analyzes and, in parallel, to the reading that Heidegger made of that text and to which reference is made on more than one occasion. With this, we can perceive that logic and ontology struggle to position themselves as the original science for the final elucidation of human beings. Thus, we take a stand in the face of the current conviction that accepts Husserl´s theory that has been overcome by the pragmatic approach of Dasein. |
|---|