ANGÚSTIA, VERDADE E “SUBJETIVIDADE": KIERKEGAARD INFLUENCIANDO HEIDEGGER
The paper discusses the influences of Kierkegaard on Heidegger’s Being and Time (both textually accepted and not accepted influences). It analyzes the footnotes where the influences are accepted and promptly rejected as inssuficient to a more solid anti-metaphysical presentation, also apporaching th...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | Brasil |
| Institución: | Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL) |
| Repositorio: | Dissertatio - Revista de Filosofia (Online) |
| Idioma: | portugués |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.ufpel:article/10028 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://periodicos.ufpel.edu.br/index.php/dissertatio/article/view/10028 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Metaphysics existentialism anxiety truth subjectivity. Metafísica existencialismo angústia verdade subjetividade. |
| Sumario: | The paper discusses the influences of Kierkegaard on Heidegger’s Being and Time (both textually accepted and not accepted influences). It analyzes the footnotes where the influences are accepted and promptly rejected as inssuficient to a more solid anti-metaphysical presentation, also apporaching the pivotal themes of anxiety (dread) and human existence. It posits the heideggeriana criticism on Kierkegaards is based on conceptual and terminological differences acquired from hegelian tradition, and they are not propperly kierkegaardiano misunderstandings on these themes. It scrutinizes textual influences of Kierkegaard on Heidegger and other non-admitted issues, such as truth and subjectivity. It points the question of truth and subjectvity as a major connection between the authors. It concludes that Heidegger only remodels Kierkegaard main core of thought, not bringing originally dissonante elements to the presentation of truth and subjectivity. |
|---|