The Judicial Rationality in Constitutional Stage
This paper defends an intermediate position on the rationality of a con-stitutional judge’s decision making, through the development of a theoretical model called the cognitive restrictor thesis, which is characterized by a series of objective parameters that cognitively construct and guide the deci...
| Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Status: | Published version |
| Publication Date: | 2021 |
| Country: | México |
| Institution: | UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO |
| Repository: | Problema. Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho |
| Language: | Spanish |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16134 |
| Online Access: | https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/filosofia-derecho/article/view/16134 |
| Access Level: | Open access |
| Keyword: | Constitutional Judge Rational Choice Judicial Decision Cognitive Restrictor Procedural Rationality Juez constitucional elección racional decisión judicial restrictor cognitivo racionalidad procedimental |
| Summary: | This paper defends an intermediate position on the rationality of a con-stitutional judge’s decision making, through the development of a theoretical model called the cognitive restrictor thesis, which is characterized by a series of objective parameters that cognitively construct and guide the decision making process in a constitutional venue, with the purpose of establishing a procedural rationality that reduces the spaces of subjec-tivity and arbitrariness of the constitutional judge. |
|---|