The Judicial Rationality in Constitutional Stage
This paper defends an intermediate position on the rationality of a con-stitutional judge’s decision making, through the development of a theoretical model called the cognitive restrictor thesis, which is characterized by a series of objective parameters that cognitively construct and guide the deci...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2021 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO |
| Repositorio: | Problema. Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16134 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/filosofia-derecho/article/view/16134 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Constitutional Judge Rational Choice Judicial Decision Cognitive Restrictor Procedural Rationality Juez constitucional elección racional decisión judicial restrictor cognitivo racionalidad procedimental |
| Sumario: | This paper defends an intermediate position on the rationality of a con-stitutional judge’s decision making, through the development of a theoretical model called the cognitive restrictor thesis, which is characterized by a series of objective parameters that cognitively construct and guide the decision making process in a constitutional venue, with the purpose of establishing a procedural rationality that reduces the spaces of subjec-tivity and arbitrariness of the constitutional judge. |
|---|