Knowledge and understanding: determinants of Trust in the President
What roles do citizens’ knowledge of the political life of the country and the understanding of political affairs play in the public’s trust in the president? By using a Latin American Pu-blic Opinion Project (lapop 2014) survey, and Ordinary Least Squares (ols) models, which include 1 100 observati...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2018 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA METROPOLITANA |
| Repositorio: | Polis: Investigación y Análisis Sociopolítico y Psicosocial |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:polis.www.revistas-conacyt.unam.mx:article/622 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://polismexico.izt.uam.mx/index.php/rp/article/view/622 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | trust, knowledge, understanding, Mexico, President. confianza, conocimiento, entendimiento, México, Presidente |
| Sumario: | What roles do citizens’ knowledge of the political life of the country and the understanding of political affairs play in the public’s trust in the president? By using a Latin American Pu-blic Opinion Project (lapop 2014) survey, and Ordinary Least Squares (ols) models, which include 1 100 observations, the present paper examines the determinants of people ́s confi-dence in the Mexican Executive. The argument is that citizens’ knowledge of political life and citizens’ understanding of political issues have different effects on public confidence in the President. In the first case, knowledge returns to the critical public opinion of the President, and the trust is hardly granted; in contrast, the belief of the citizens that they understand the affairs of national life, makes the public opinion “generous” as regards the granting of their trust to the Executive. This finding suggests that knowledge and understanding of political issues are two distinct variables whose effects on trust in political institutions are opposite: knowledge has negative effects on trust; while the understanding has positive effects. |
|---|