Gender mainstreaming and sports public policy: The case of CONADE

This article is a revision about the incorporation of the gender mainstreaming in the CONADE, the objective was to identify with interviews and an analysis from a qualitative perspective the situation of the incorporation of the gender mainstreaming in the sports public policy of high performance be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Mendoza-Farias, Francisco J Javier, Quintal-López, Rocío Ivonne, Paredes, Leticia Janet
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2019
País:México
Institución:UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE NUEVO LEÓN
Repositorio:Política, Globalidad y Ciudadanía
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:revpoliticas.uanl.mx:article/108
Acceso en línea:https://revpoliticas.uanl.mx/index.php/RPGyC/article/view/108
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Gender equality
gender gaps
gender mainstreaming
public policy
sport
Deporte
brechas de género
igualdad de género
perspectiva de género
política pública.
Descripción
Sumario:This article is a revision about the incorporation of the gender mainstreaming in the CONADE, the objective was to identify with interviews and an analysis from a qualitative perspective the situation of the incorporation of the gender mainstreaming in the sports public policy of high performance between the 2012 and 2018, and also to identify some gender gaps. The method was the grounded theory where the theory is created from the information.  It was found that women have been gradually accessing decision-making positions but there is still a long way to go, also the lack of policies of conciliation of work, family and social life, as well as attention in cases of harassment. It is concluded that progress in terms of gender perspective and sport has been slow since it is observed that some measures are still a sample of good actions without major importance as the lack of giving information to athletes about harassment.