The judicial dialogue among constitutional Courts: The case of Mexico
Why do supreme courts use international law? This work suggests that, in Mexico, the arrival of a new judge with a different profile and an atypical staff progressively introduced a jurisprudential dialogue within the Court. Additionally, it is shown how the minister trained his staff in internation...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2021 |
| País: | México |
| Institución: | UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO |
| Repositorio: | Cuestiones Constitucionales. Revista Mexicana de Derecho Constitucional |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16160 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/cuestiones-constitucionales/article/view/16160 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Judges Supreme Court International law Human Rights jueces Suprema Corte derecho internacional derechos humanos |
| Sumario: | Why do supreme courts use international law? This work suggests that, in Mexico, the arrival of a new judge with a different profile and an atypical staff progressively introduced a jurisprudential dialogue within the Court. Additionally, it is shown how the minister trained his staff in international courts and tribunals in order to get in contact with international law. These factors, combined with a favorable environment for human rights, led the Supreme Court to begin using jurisprudential dialogue. |
|---|