Improving the Early Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men in the Challenging Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 Category
The efficacy of tools for selection of candidates for prostate biopsy after multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) varies across Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) categories. The new Proclarix test performs better than prostate-specific antigen density and the European R...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona |
| Repositorio: | Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ddd.uab.cat:257285 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://ddd.uab.cat/record/257285 https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1016/j.euros.2021.12.009 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Clinically significant prostate cancer Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging Proclarix Prostate-specific antigen density European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer predictive model |
| id |
ES_ff9ef535245bfc3fa840326cfdc6aa01 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ddd.uab.cat:257285 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Improving the Early Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men in the Challenging Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 Category |
| title |
Improving the Early Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men in the Challenging Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 Category |
| spellingShingle |
Improving the Early Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men in the Challenging Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 Category Morote Robles, Juan|||0000-0002-2168-323X Clinically significant prostate cancer Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging Proclarix Prostate-specific antigen density European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer predictive model |
| title_short |
Improving the Early Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men in the Challenging Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 Category |
| title_full |
Improving the Early Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men in the Challenging Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 Category |
| title_fullStr |
Improving the Early Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men in the Challenging Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 Category |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Improving the Early Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men in the Challenging Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 Category |
| title_sort |
Improving the Early Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men in the Challenging Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 Category |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Morote Robles, Juan|||0000-0002-2168-323X Campistol i Torres, Miriam|||0000-0002-3212-3473 Triquell, Marina|||0000-0003-3881-8177 Celma, Ana|||0000-0002-3128-3811 Regis, Lucas|||0000-0001-7121-1946 de Torres, Inés|||0000-0002-5495-9140 Semidey Raven, Maria Eugenia|||0000-0001-8539-9265 Mast, Richard|||0000-0001-6005-800X Santamaría Margalef, Anna|||0000-0001-6726-8990 Planas Morin, Jacques|||0000-0002-0222-584X Trilla Herrera, Enrique|||0000-0001-9401-0872 |
| author |
Morote Robles, Juan|||0000-0002-2168-323X |
| author_facet |
Morote Robles, Juan|||0000-0002-2168-323X Campistol i Torres, Miriam|||0000-0002-3212-3473 Triquell, Marina|||0000-0003-3881-8177 Celma, Ana|||0000-0002-3128-3811 Regis, Lucas|||0000-0001-7121-1946 de Torres, Inés|||0000-0002-5495-9140 Semidey Raven, Maria Eugenia|||0000-0001-8539-9265 Mast, Richard|||0000-0001-6005-800X Santamaría Margalef, Anna|||0000-0001-6726-8990 Planas Morin, Jacques|||0000-0002-0222-584X Trilla Herrera, Enrique|||0000-0001-9401-0872 |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Campistol i Torres, Miriam|||0000-0002-3212-3473 Triquell, Marina|||0000-0003-3881-8177 Celma, Ana|||0000-0002-3128-3811 Regis, Lucas|||0000-0001-7121-1946 de Torres, Inés|||0000-0002-5495-9140 Semidey Raven, Maria Eugenia|||0000-0001-8539-9265 Mast, Richard|||0000-0001-6005-800X Santamaría Margalef, Anna|||0000-0001-6726-8990 Planas Morin, Jacques|||0000-0002-0222-584X Trilla Herrera, Enrique|||0000-0001-9401-0872 |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinically significant prostate cancer Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging Proclarix Prostate-specific antigen density European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer predictive model |
| topic |
Clinically significant prostate cancer Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging Proclarix Prostate-specific antigen density European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer predictive model |
| description |
The efficacy of tools for selection of candidates for prostate biopsy after multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) varies across Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) categories. The new Proclarix test performs better than prostate-specific antigen density and the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer MRI predictive model in the challenging PI-RADS 3 category. Proclarix guaranteed 100% detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa), avoiding almost one-quarter of prostate biopsies and decreasing overdetection of insignificant PCa from 16.6% to 11.2%. Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) category 3 is a challenging scenario for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) and some tools can improve the selection of appropriate candidates for prostate biopsy. To assess the performance of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) model, the new Proclarix test, and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) in selecting candidates for prostate biopsy among men in the PI-RADS 3 category. We conducted a head-to-head prospective analysis of 567 men suspected of having PCa for whom guided and systematic biopsies were scheduled between January 2018 and March 2020 in a single academic institution. A PI-RADS v.2 category 3 lesion was identified in 169 men (29.8%). csPCa, insignificant PCa (iPCa), and unnecessary biopsy rates were analysed. csPCa was defined as grade group ≥2. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, decision curve analysis curves, and clinical utility curves were plotted. PCa was detected in 53/169 men (31.4%) with a PI-RADS 3 lesion, identified as csPCa in 25 (14.8%) and iPCa in 28 (16.6%). The area under the ROC curve for csPCa detection was 0.703 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.621-0.768) for Proclarix, 0.657 (95% CI 0.547-0.766) for the ERSPC MRI model, and 0.612 (95% CI 0.497-0.727) for PSAD (p = 0.027). The threshold with the highest sensitivity was 10% for Proclarix, 1.5% for the ERSPC MRI model, and 0.07 ng/ml/cm 3 for PSAD, which yielded sensitivity of 100%, 91%, and 84%, respectively. Some 21.3%, 26.2%, and 7.1% of biopsies would be avoided with Proclarix, PSAD, and the ERSPC MRI model, respectively. Proclarix showed a net benefit over PSAD and the ERSPC MRI model. Both Proclarix and PSAD reduced iPCa overdetection from 16.6% to 11.3%, while the ERSPC MRI model reduced iPCa overdetection to 15.4%. Proclarix was more accurate in selecting appropriate candidates for prostate biopsy among men in the PI-RADS 3 category when compared to PSAD and the ERSPC MRI model. Proclarix detected 100% of csPCa cases and would reduce prostate biopsies by 21.3% and iPCa overdetection by 5.3%. We compared three methods and found that the Proclarix test can optimise the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in men with a score of 3 on the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System for magnetic resonance imaging scans. |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2 2022-01-01 2022 2022-01-01 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
Article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 VoR http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |
| dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
article |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ddd.uab.cat/record/257285 https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1016/j.euros.2021.12.009 |
| url |
https://ddd.uab.cat/record/257285 https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1016/j.euros.2021.12.009 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés eng |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Salud Carlos III https://doi.org/10.13039/501100004587 PI20/01666 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
open access http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ |
| dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
open access http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB instname:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona |
| instname_str |
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona |
| reponame_str |
Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB |
| collection |
Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869425790550016000 |
| spelling |
Improving the Early Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men in the Challenging Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 CategoryMorote Robles, Juan|||0000-0002-2168-323XCampistol i Torres, Miriam|||0000-0002-3212-3473Triquell, Marina|||0000-0003-3881-8177Celma, Ana|||0000-0002-3128-3811Regis, Lucas|||0000-0001-7121-1946de Torres, Inés|||0000-0002-5495-9140Semidey Raven, Maria Eugenia|||0000-0001-8539-9265Mast, Richard|||0000-0001-6005-800XSantamaría Margalef, Anna|||0000-0001-6726-8990Planas Morin, Jacques|||0000-0002-0222-584XTrilla Herrera, Enrique|||0000-0001-9401-0872Clinically significant prostate cancerMultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingProclarixProstate-specific antigen densityEuropean Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer predictive modelThe efficacy of tools for selection of candidates for prostate biopsy after multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) varies across Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) categories. The new Proclarix test performs better than prostate-specific antigen density and the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer MRI predictive model in the challenging PI-RADS 3 category. Proclarix guaranteed 100% detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa), avoiding almost one-quarter of prostate biopsies and decreasing overdetection of insignificant PCa from 16.6% to 11.2%. Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) category 3 is a challenging scenario for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) and some tools can improve the selection of appropriate candidates for prostate biopsy. To assess the performance of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) model, the new Proclarix test, and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) in selecting candidates for prostate biopsy among men in the PI-RADS 3 category. We conducted a head-to-head prospective analysis of 567 men suspected of having PCa for whom guided and systematic biopsies were scheduled between January 2018 and March 2020 in a single academic institution. A PI-RADS v.2 category 3 lesion was identified in 169 men (29.8%). csPCa, insignificant PCa (iPCa), and unnecessary biopsy rates were analysed. csPCa was defined as grade group ≥2. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, decision curve analysis curves, and clinical utility curves were plotted. PCa was detected in 53/169 men (31.4%) with a PI-RADS 3 lesion, identified as csPCa in 25 (14.8%) and iPCa in 28 (16.6%). The area under the ROC curve for csPCa detection was 0.703 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.621-0.768) for Proclarix, 0.657 (95% CI 0.547-0.766) for the ERSPC MRI model, and 0.612 (95% CI 0.497-0.727) for PSAD (p = 0.027). The threshold with the highest sensitivity was 10% for Proclarix, 1.5% for the ERSPC MRI model, and 0.07 ng/ml/cm 3 for PSAD, which yielded sensitivity of 100%, 91%, and 84%, respectively. Some 21.3%, 26.2%, and 7.1% of biopsies would be avoided with Proclarix, PSAD, and the ERSPC MRI model, respectively. Proclarix showed a net benefit over PSAD and the ERSPC MRI model. Both Proclarix and PSAD reduced iPCa overdetection from 16.6% to 11.3%, while the ERSPC MRI model reduced iPCa overdetection to 15.4%. Proclarix was more accurate in selecting appropriate candidates for prostate biopsy among men in the PI-RADS 3 category when compared to PSAD and the ERSPC MRI model. Proclarix detected 100% of csPCa cases and would reduce prostate biopsies by 21.3% and iPCa overdetection by 5.3%. We compared three methods and found that the Proclarix test can optimise the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in men with a score of 3 on the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System for magnetic resonance imaging scans. 22022-01-0120222022-01-01Articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501VoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://ddd.uab.cat/record/257285https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1016/j.euros.2021.12.009reponame:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UABinstname:Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaInglésengInstituto de Salud Carlos III https://doi.org/10.13039/501100004587 PI20/01666open accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Aquest document està subjecte a una llicència d'ús Creative Commons. Es permet la reproducció total o parcial, la distribució i la comunicació pública de l'obra, sempre que es reconegui l'autoria de l'obra original. No es permet la creació d'obres derivades.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ddd.uab.cat:2572852026-06-06T12:50:31Z |
| score |
15.300719 |